Lottery or Merit? Lowell High Admissions Policy Comes Up for a Key Vote

Date:

San Francisco has seen the Board of Education take up Lowell High School admissions several times in recent years. But a vote Wednesday will mark a stark shift borne from the recall—regardless of the outcome. 

Historically, school officials left Lowell alone despite a looming legal issue for its longstanding merit-based admissions against state law for a comprehensive public high school. Despite efforts to increase diversity, the well-resourced, high-performing school has disproportionately low numbers of Black and Latinx students—making it a glaring example of school segregation to critics. 

That changed in October 2020, when the pandemic prevented the San Francisco Unified School District from conducting its special assessments for Lowell and the governing board largely favored long-term changes

After another racist incident set off calls to change the culture, the board voted 5-2 on a nascent proposal to permanently end merit-based admissions at Lowell. The decision was later undone after a judge determined it was improperly agendized

Thus, the lottery was extended temporarily, once again.

That 5-2 vote played a key role in fueling the landslide recall of three commissioners, all of whom voted in favor of permanently ending merit-based admissions. And with the recall, they were replaced with three commissioners who wanted to revisit lottery admissions or outright restore the selective process. 

Last week, that shift came into clear view. 

The board took up discussion around two proposals from Superintendent Vincent Matthews: one to extend lottery admissions for Lowell High an additional year to 2023-24, and another to form a task force to determine a long-term solution. 

One could pass or fail without the other.

The task force would examine admissions policies and programs for Lowell and all of its high schools. The group would present updates each quarter culminating in recommendations by April 30. 

All board members spoke in favor of the task force after four hours of public comment tinged with racial divisions. But when it came to the extension, commissioners seemed mixed in their leanings and left an uncertain outcome that could lurch Lowell back to merit-based admissions after strides in diversity. 

Commissioner Ann Hsu—a recall volunteer appointed by Mayor London Breed, along with Lainie Motamedi and Lisa Weissman-Ward up for election in November—stood by her longstanding call to restore merit-based admissions. In a previous interview with The Standard, she welcomed litigation that might result from its restoration.

“Restoring Lowell to criteria based admissions will signal to the community that high standards do matter, that hard work and academic excellence do matter” Hsu said on Thursday. ”These values are not in opposition to or mutually exclusive of values of diversity and equity.” 

Motamedi, an appointee screened by the recall camp as in favor of restoring merit-based admissions like Hsu, said it wasn’t fair to extend one year at a time while Weissman-Ward expressed disappointment in the choices. President Jenny Lam, who is poised to cast the swing vote, acknowledged the binary choice. 

“There are going to be different ways we look at the selective admissions criteria going forward,” Lam said, who added she is still deliberating. “It has to be authentic, it has to bring communities together.”

Vice President Kevine Boggess, who voted against the permanent change with Lam out of concern for process, expressed support for the recommendations, as did Commissioners Matt Alexander and Mark Sanchez.

“I don’t want us to go backward in time,” Sanchez said at the Thursday meeting. “We’ve seen from the data that 20 years of [diversity admissions efforts] does not work. This district was founded on a lot of racist ideas. Lowell is not an island unto itself.”

Lowell comprises 48.5% Asian students, 17.7% white students, 14.1% Latinx students, 2% Black students, and 5.4% Filipino students, according to district data. Its freshman class admitted through the lottery system is 43.6% Asian, 15.7% white, 21.6% Latinx, 4% Black and 4.6% Filipino.

To return to merit-based admissions for the 2023-24 school year, staff estimated it would take about $40,500 in overtime costs and additional technical resources to train new staff, buy tests, prepare materials and communicate the changes with families of eighth graders. The cost for a facilitator of the task force is not yet known.

Looming over the decision to return to merit-based admissions is its legality

School officials also danced around the lawfulness  of Lowell’s merit-based admissions, only stating that everyone on the task force should have a baseline understanding of the legal landscape. 

The district previously told The Standard that the next admissions policy for Lowell must align with state law, “which explicitly prohibits public school districts from making enrollment decisions based on the student’s academic performance.”

In any case, under the previous board there would be little question of the proposals’ approval. 

The oft-mentioned reset of the new board is here. And Wednesday’s likely split vote will no doubt prove that.

The post Lottery or Merit? Lowell High Admissions Policy Comes Up for a Key Vote appeared first on The Paloalto Digest.

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Payday Lending at a Crossroads: Balancing Access to Credit with Consumer Protection

Payday lending, a quick fix for cash-strapped individuals, has...

FTC Tightens Rules on Influencers, Endorsements, and Consumer Reviews

In 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) introduced significant...

Regulators Tighten Scrutiny on Advertising Targeted at Children and Teens

Advertising aimed at children and teens is facing increasing...

Crypto Wallet for Business: How BitHide Helps Companies Safely Manage Cryptocurrencies

When choosing a crypto wallet for business, entrepreneurs have several key requirements: «I need to control my assets»,  «I want to minimize the risk of funds being blocked», «I need the ability to make mass payouts and automatic withdrawals», and «It’s crucial that my transactions aren’t tracked by competitors or hackers».   Each of these needs reflects a pain point. The BitHide team has developed effective solutions to meet these demands, ensuring high-quality crypto processing for businesses.  BitHide: A Secure Crypto Wallet for Companies  You can’t focus on growing your business if you aren’t confident in the safety of your cryptocurrency assets. With BitHide, these security concerns are addressed through several innovative features.  Mnemonic Phrase for Users  Business owners who choose BitHide to manage their financial flows remain in full control of their crypto assets. Upon first login, users receive a seed phrase, ensuring access to funds even if the server is physically destroyed.  Non-Custodial Product  BitHide’s software is installed on the client’s own server, ensuring that no third parties can interfere with the company’s finances.  IP Address Masking  Cryptocurrencies are not as anonymous as many believe. Hackers and corporations can set up nodes worldwide to capture users’ IP addresses during transactions. For companies, having their wallet’s real IP address exposed can lead to serious risks.  BitHide’s Dark Wing technology, combining VPN and Tor, ensures that the IP address is changed multiple times, making it nearly impossible to trace. This ensures that managing a crypto wallet with BitHide is both secure and private.  Database Encryption  In addition to the seed phrase, each BitHide client receives a unique 512-bit key upon first login. This key is used for both login and encrypting the transaction history.  Optional KYC Checks  BitHide is software, not a service, meaning clients can decide whether their users need to undergo KYC checks.  Built-In Risk Assessment for Crypto Assets  One of the essential features when choosing a crypto wallet for business is the ability to assess the risk levels of cryptocurrencies directly within the wallet.  BitHide allows clients to evaluate both internal and external addresses manually or automatically. This helps businesses avoid mixing high- and low-risk assets, significantly reducing the likelihood of funds being blocked.  Crypto Wallet Management with BitHide: Intuitive and Easy  Security is critical when selecting a tool for crypto processing in business, but ease of use is equally important. BitHide offers an extensive range of features, making crypto management as straightforward as handling fiat currency.  Unlimited Sub-Wallets and Addresses  When managing multiple revenue streams, having the ability to create unlimited sub-wallets and addresses is a necessity. It ensures clear, transparent financial flows, and the option to add comments to transactions or addresses simplifies auditing and report generation.  Collaborative Access  BitHide allows businesses to assign roles to multiple employees, ensuring that everyone has the appropriate level of access to the wallet.  Report Generation and Exporting  Every business needs balance reports and transaction tracking. With BitHide, you can generate and export reports in Excel or CSV formats. The tool also allows for the assignment of payment purposes and captures crypto exchange rates at the time of deposit.  Automated Withdrawals and Mass Payouts Clients can set up one-time or recurring automatic withdrawals to one or multiple addresses.   BitHide also has the mass payout functionality, allowing you to send funds to more than 10-20 addresses.  Competent and Fast Technical Support  Our professional tech support personnel address any of your issues or concerns within five minutes; rest assured that your questions or concerns will be resolved in no time.   Why BitHide is the Ideal Choice for Businesses  BitHide meets all the essential requirements when choosing a crypto wallet for business. It ensures security, privacy, and ease of use, offering all the tools you need to manage your cryptocurrency financial flows effectively. With BitHide, you can focus on growing your business without the headache of dealing with inefficient tools that weren’t designed for companis.